The Supreme Court's assessment of gun rights has been largely shaped by originalist readings, but that doesn't necessarily settle the debate.

Our dedication to the value of efficiency means that the historically marginalized stay marginalized.

Might we have a moral obligation not to trivialize the suffering of others?

What are the drawbacks and advantages of our political discourse migrating to social media platforms?

What role and responsibilities does American democracy assume of the minority party?

The genre is full of moral pitfalls and sticky situations for producers and consumers alike.

Anger, grief, and even joy affect our moral reasoning in ways still left unexplored.

If voting in secret encourages members of Congress to vote their conscience, why shouldn't secret voting be the norm?

The co-commitments of abortion-based anti-vaccine rhetoric seem to produce untenable results.

Evanston's latest policy proposal faces moral and legal challenges from enemies as well as would-be allies.

Generating clean energy with turbines seems to be in our interests, but how do we decide where we should we put them?

Decried as the uncontrollable behemoth risen by the left, cancel culture has long existed as a societal tool that knows no affiliation.

Is the filibuster the linchpin holding it all together or a relic from a bygone era holding us back?

Being conscious of our online behavior is the first step in combating misinformation.

Deploying the vocabulary of hate crime legislation might be more important than prosecuting offenders.

Recent events once again require us to explain on what grounds we might justify social restrictions to speech.

Given the impact Disney has in shaping young minds, might the company have an obligation to use its power to make amends for past harm?

Does journalists' use of social media undermine the field's commitment to objectivity?

We're getting awfully good at spinning selfishness as altruism.

The kidnapping and murder of Sarah Everard represents structural violence and is not the unexplainable and unimaginable act it's been made out to be.

Concerns over privacy and the use of police funds may hobble the deployment of new peacekeeping technology.

How can we balance our commitment to the people's voice with the need for policy that is scientifically informed?

The push to remove and rename isn't about judging history; it's about communicating with the present.

How can we guard against a willingness to be deceived in our quest to see the complete picture?