← Return to search results

Beauty and the Beast

by Teddy Slater


Beauty and the Beast is a classic fairy tale that explores questions of just punishment and coercion in relationships.

Long ago, a prince refuses shelter to an enchantress, so she curses him to live as a hideous Beast and transforms his servants into household items. In order to break the spell, the Beast must find someone to love him before the last petal falls off a magic rose. Nearby lives a young woman named Belle, whose father is an inventor. He’s taken captive by the Beast but Belle insists on taking his place at the castle. As Belle and the Beast get to know each other and face danger together, they eventually fall in love, breaking the curse.

Read aloud video

Guidelines for Philosophical Discussion

Beauty and the Beast immediately raises questions about punishment. To begin the story, an enchantress curses a prince who does not provide her shelter in exchange for a rose. The punishment that she metes out causes the prince to turn into a hideous beast, and unless he learns to love someone and earn their love in return, the curse will not be broken. Moreover, the servants of the prince’s castle are all turned into pieces of furniture and decor. The curse will become irreversible after the falling of the rose’s last petal. This instance of punishment may seem odd for a variety of reasons. First, one could question whether or not the enchantress carries the appropriate authority to give out such a punishment. Secondly, the punishment seems a bit overboard. After all, it is not obvious that the prince was obligated to provide shelter for the enchantress; and even if he was, the curse that she placed on him and his servants was much harsher than the night she would have spent outside in the storm.

Many people believe that punishment should come from a proper authority, such as one’s parents or the government. Why can’t it be the case that a person of equal standing should be charged with administering punishment as well? In the case of the enchantress, it might seem obvious that she has special powers that no one else seems to have; these powers also seem to be unbeatable. Thus, most children would probably come to the conclusion that the enchantress has the proper authority. But what about parents punishing their children, or brothers and sisters or friends punishing each other, should they be able to administer punishment as well? What gives someone the right to give punishments to others?

The second point raises a question about the severity of the enchantress’s punishment on the prince and his servants. Mainly, how should one carry out punishment and why? As was mentioned before, the punishment seems harsh. This was definitely not an “eye for an eye” punishment, whereby the enchantress would have locked the prince outside of his castle in the cold rain. It was worse than that! But maybe the enchantress had good reason for such a severe punishment. Recall that the enchantress saw that the “[Prince] had no love in his heart.” Perhaps the utter lack of love in one’s heart is so much of an egregious sin as to warrant such a damning punishment, not only for the prince but to his servants as well – maybe, maybe not. Furthermore, the enchantress might have thought that her punishment would change the prince for a greater good (which it did). Maybe the enchantress also wanted to deter any of the servants from acting like their prince. But, do any of these reasons make the enchantress’s punishment justified? Ultimately, when is it okay to punish someone, and how harsh should the punishment be?

Another interesting issue raised by the events in the story is coercion. One instance of coercion in the story is when Gaston plots to put Maurice in an insane asylum unless Belle agrees to marry him. Gaston’s proposition to Belle has two potential consequences; one in which Gaston gets the marriage he wants and Belle’s father is kept away from the insane asylum, and another in which Gaston doesn’t get the marriage and Belle’s father is sent away. It may seem that the first outcome is favorable for both Gaston and Belle in this situation; however, this is only possible because Gaston is using Maurice’s imprisonment in the asylum as a threat. The choice Gaston gives to Belle is: Marry me or your father goes to the asylum.

Most would hopefully say that Gaston’s offer is not fair. However, if the circumstances were different and Maurice was not heading off to the asylum, would it be fair if Gaston, instead, offered Belle one million dollars to marry him? Is this coercion? What makes the two offers different from each other?

Questions for Philosophical Discussion


  1. What makes someone worthy of carrying out punishment?
  2. Why did the enchantress punish the prince? Did he deserve the punishment?
  3. Was the punishment the prince received too harsh? Why?
  4. When is it okay for someone to be punished?
  5. What should be the goals of punishment?
  6. How harsh should the punishment be?


  1. How did Gaston try to get Belle to marry him? Did it work? Is this okay? Why or why not?
  2. What if Gaston instead offered Belle one million dollars for her hand in marriage instead of sending her father off to the asylum? Is this okay? Why? What makes the last offer different from this offer?
  3. Why do we try to get people to do things?
  4. When is it wrong to try to get people to do things? Is it ever right or necessary?

Original questions and guidelines for philosophical discussion by Samuel Diaz de Leon and Angel Villa. Edited June 2020 by The Janet Prindle Institute for Ethics.

Find tips for leading a philosophical discussion on our Resources page.

Download & Print Email Book Module Back to All Books
Back to All Books Cover image for the book Beauty and the Beast with a cartoon rendering of a young white woman in a pink and burgundy robe being gently escorted through the snow by a giant beast wearing a purple cape. Download & Print Email Book Module

About the Prindle Institute

As one of the largest collegiate ethics institutes in the country, the Prindle Institute for Ethics’ uniquely robust national outreach mission serves DePauw students, faculty and staff; academics and scholars throughout the United States and in the international community; life-long learners; and the Greencastle community in a variety of ways. In 2019, the Prindle Institute partrnered with Thomas Wartenberg and became the digital home of his Teaching Children Philosophy discussion guides.

Further Resources

Some of the books on this site may contain characterizations or illustrations that are culturally insensitive or inaccurate. We encourage educators to visit the Association for Library Service to Children’s resource guide for talking to children about issues of race and culture in literature. They also have a guide for navigating tough conversations.  PBS Kids’ set of resources for talking to young children about race and racism might also be useful for educators.

Philosophy often deals with big questions like the existence of a higher power or death. Find tips for leading a philosophical discussion on our resources page.

Visit Us.


2961 W County Road 225 S
Greencastle, IN 46135



Monday - Friday: 8:00AM - 5:00PM
Saturday-Sunday: closed