← Return to search results

Trosclair and the Alligator

by Peter Huggins


Trosclair and the Alligator hits on both the nature of lying and deception and the permissibility of lying and deception.

Trosclair is a young boy living by a swamp in Louisiana. He is told not to go into Bee Island Swamp because of the terrible alligator, Gargantua. Trosclair and his dog Ollie go into the swamp, despite his father’s wishes. They climb a tree, and Gargantua appears below them. Trosclair tricks Gargantua into eating a beehive instead of his dog Ollie. Gargantua runs away and is never seen again.

Read aloud video by Stories with Starr

Guidelines for Philosophical Discussion

There are several ways to go with this discussion. The story hits on the nature of lying and deception and the permissibility of lying and deception. The discussion can be approached from either direction before the two topics are tied together. By approaching the nature of lying and deception, you can get the children to create their own definitions for the two terms before asking if either is ever permissible.

Nature of Lying and Deception

The nature of lying and deception appears when Trosclair is talking to Gargantua. Trosclair deceives Gargantua, but does he lie to him? He does omit parts of the truth, but never says anything that is false. By asking the children whether they think Trosclair deceived or lied, the children can think about what they take lying and deception to be. If they think Trosclair lied, then you can ask if he said anything false. When you ask the children, they may say the intention of the speaker determines whether or not they are lying. Once you have determined what the children believe lying is, you can approach the idea of deception. When someone says something with the intent of making you believe something false, we call this deception (whether that statement was a lie or not). It seems like Trosclair deceived Gargantua in this story. He deceives him by convincing Gargantua that eating the beehive would be better than eating Ollie. Trosclair said, “It’s just full to bursting of the sweetest, TASTIEST honey you’ve ever seen it,” knowing full well that Gargantua would believe him. Trosclair intended for Gargantua to believe the sweetness of the honey, but conveniently left out the harm that would come from eating the bees. This might be a good moment for you to ask the children whether omitting information could be considered a form of deception. Maybe ask them to recall a time when they did something they knew their parents wouldn’t appreciate, so they told a “half-truth” and conveniently left out the more incriminating details. This can help the children start to define what they take deception to mean. At this point, you can start to distinguish the differences between lying and deception.

Permissibility of Lying and Deception

After establishing the nature of lying and deception and identifying the differences between them, a discussion to determine the permissibility of lying and deception can now take place. You might start by asking whether it was acceptable for Trosclair to deceive Gargantua. The most popular response will most likely be along the lines of “Yes because he and Ollie were in danger of losing their lives.” A suitable follow-up could be to ask whether deceiving Gargantua would still be right if Trosclair had had an escape route. Eventually, you’ll want to turn the conversation towards the question of when, if ever, it is ok to lie or deceive to help others (instead of yourself). To start, you may ask whether it would have been better for Trosclair to lie to Gargantua instead of deceiving him. We also see in this story that Trosclair deceives Gargantua for his own benefit by harming Gargantua to save Ollie’s and his own life. Is lying and deception inherently selfish, or can it be used to do good for others? Once you’ve imagined scenarios in which lying could better or worse than deceiving and when each could be beneficial or selfish, you can begin to ask, in a general sense, when it is permissible to lie or deceive.

Questions for Philosophical Discussion

Nature of Lying and Deception

  1. How does Trosclair save Ollie?
  2. Does Trosclair lie to Gargantua when he says (in reference to the beehive) “It’s just full to bursting of the sweetest, TASTIEST honey you’ve ever seen it. I’m glad you don’t want it!”? Why or why not?
  3. If he didn’t lie, what did he do?
  4. Does Trosclair leave out pieces of information? When?
  5. Is leaving out pieces of information a way of lying?
  6. Have you ever lied to someone? How did you lie?
  7. What is a lie?
  8. Gargantua says that Trosclair tricked him. How did Trosclair trick him?
  9. How does Trosclair trick Gargantua without lying to him?
  10. Can you trick someone without lying to them? How?
  11. Have you ever tricked someone? How did you trick them?
  12. What does it mean to trick someone?

Permissibility of Lying and Deception

  1. Was Trosclair right to trick Gargantua? Why?
  2. Would it have been better or worse for Trosclair to lie to Gargantua? Why?
  3. Which is worse, tricking or lying? Why?
  4. Is it ever okay to lie to someone? Why or why not?
  5. Can you think of a time when you tricked someone because it was better for you? What about a time when it was better for them?
  6. Is it okay to lie to someone for your benefit? Why or why not?
  7. Is it okay to lie to someone if it is for their benefit? Why or why not?
  8. Is it ever okay to trick someone? Why or why not?

Original questions and guidelines for philosophical discussion by Henry Liedl & Natalie Bulger. Edited June 2020 by The Janet Prindle Institute for Ethics.

Find tips for leading a philosophical discussion on our Resources page.

Download & Print Email Book Module Back to All Books
Back to All Books Cover image for Trosclair and the Alligator featuring an illustration of a young boy in a white tank top and shorts standing knee-deep in a swamp next to a boat with a dog in it. An alligator peeks out of the water, but the boy and the dog both look happy Download & Print Email Book Module

About the Prindle Institute

As one of the largest collegiate ethics institutes in the country, the Prindle Institute for Ethics’ uniquely robust national outreach mission serves DePauw students, faculty and staff; academics and scholars throughout the United States and in the international community; life-long learners; and the Greencastle community in a variety of ways. In 2019, the Prindle Institute partrnered with Thomas Wartenberg and became the digital home of his Teaching Children Philosophy discussion guides.

Further Resources

Some of the books on this site may contain characterizations or illustrations that are culturally insensitive or inaccurate. We encourage educators to visit the Association for Library Service to Children’s resource guide for talking to children about issues of race and culture in literature. They also have a guide for navigating tough conversations.  PBS Kids’ set of resources for talking to young children about race and racism might also be useful for educators.

Philosophy often deals with big questions like the existence of a higher power or death. Find tips for leading a philosophical discussion on our resources page.

Visit Us.


2961 W County Road 225 S
Greencastle, IN 46135



Monday - Friday: 8:00AM - 5:00PM
Saturday-Sunday: closed