We should investigate the assumptions behind newly proposed laws.

Who should shoulder the lion's share of the burden?

Are meat hunting and trophy hunting really so morally indistinguishable?

Developed nations taking credit for the reducing emissions in poorer countries produces unfortunate results.

Doesn't the focus on expected utility and the greater good encourage behavior like this?

Can we justify the use of taxpayer dollars to subsidize this "shared good"?

Walzer's hypothetical scenario is a dangerous fiction that threatens real harm.

Can the presumed harms be outweighed by the democratization of information?

Why should citizens swear allegiance to the Crown?

There is more to our recognition of race than essentialism or colorblindness.

Is the freedom that a motorcycle promises all it's cracked up to be?

What lessons has Serial taught us about the criminal justice system?

These two approaches to moral action are worlds apart.

More often than not, the examination of privilege misses the mark.

Is there a moral message lurking behind our immediate revulsion?

Should the vandalism of priceless works of art be considered off the table?

How much blame do our individual consumer choices really deserve?

When it comes to politics, incremental change is often overlooked and undervalued.

What does death mean to an insect and a life lived in moments?

Why not have a million monkeys hammering away at a million keyboards til the end of time?

Applied or theoretical? What's the best approach when building a code of conduct from the ground up?

How should we guard against the fact that our power outstrips our knowledge?

By what standard should we judge true crime beyond mere entertainment value?

"Look to your left, then to your right. Three years from now, only one of you will still be here."